Fright. Fury. Finger-pointing.
History can offer entire libraries devoted to that sequence and its
consequences -- which commonly involve power positions, political
manoeuvering and, often as not, scapegoating; for surely, someone must be to
blame for what happened.
The totally unexpected attack upon the great U.S. naval base at Pearl Harbor,
Hawaii, on 7 December 1941, was no exception to this generality. And in
prompt consequence, two very senior American officers, men of previously
outstanding professional records, lost not only their positions and careers,
but also their ranks and reputations. Meanwhile, others at least equally
involved and in whole or part professionally responsible for the debacle
escaped any trace of blame. This official aftermath of the Japanese attack
has since been severely questioned both officially and privately numerous
times by many, including Members of Congress and the U.S. Senate, a variety
of serving and retired officers, historians, veterans' organisations, the
aging Pearl Harbor Survivors' Association. Not least among these are
surviving and descendant family members of those two men, who are yet
pursuing their forebears' vindication more than a half-century later -- a
possibility yet being variously fought against, stalled, and sidetracked by
high officialdom both political and in the Pentagon, for to do otherwise
would automatically point fingers very embarrassingly and sharply elsewhere
at certain celebrated men, plus at their own official actions long ago.
It has all the elements of a great Shakespearean tragedy: ambitions, egos,
assumptions, secrets, clues, deceptions, beliefs, errors, friendships,
betrayals, public uproar and private contriving -- and, of course, love,
death, and a wish for revenge. As of 6 December 1941 there were certain main
players.
Franklin Delano Roosevent -- President of the United States, and legal
Commander-in-Chief of all U.S. armed forces. All officers above the ranks of
Major-General or Rear-Admiral are nominated by the President, and appointed
to higher rank with "advice and consent" of the U.S. Senate.
Harold R. "Betty" Stark -- Admiral; Chief of Naval Operations (CNO), the
functional head of the entire U.S. Navy; Navy Department, Washington, D.C. A
very able administrator with seven very successful ship commands, Stark was
selected over 50 more senior men to be CNO on 1 August 1939, and was firmly
in favour of creating the strongest navy in the world.
Ernest J. "Jesus" King -- Admiral; Commander-in-Chief, Atlantic Fleet; at
Norfolk, Virginia. A Great War veteran as a junior officer in the Sixth
Battle Fleet at Scapa Flow, he was aloof, austere, cool with subordinates and
distant from others; strongly opinionated, of persistent rank ambition, and
adept at Navy Department politics, he was less a leader than a "driver", and
held a lifelong anglophobia.
Husband E. Kimmel -- Admiral; Commander-in-Chief, Pacific Fleet; at Pearl
Harbor, Hawaii. A highly skilled and detail-minded professional with a
spotless record, he was noted for his intense style in operations, and "his
tenacious compulsion to obtain and act on information without delay was a
trait that never diminished."
Richmond Kelly Turner -- Rear-Admiral; Chief of both Naval Communications and
Naval Intelligence; Navy Department, Washington, D.C. Since his days as a
Naval Academy midshipman he held a reputation for being forceful, so
intimidating he often got his seniors to make room for him and his ways
simply to avoid confrontation; something of a bullying sort, and with
considerable ambition in the realm of Navy Department politics.
George Catlett Marshall -- General; Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army; War
Department, Washington, D.C. Unlike all other top Army officers, he was not a
graduate of the Military Academy at West Point, but of the famed and equally
stringent Virginia Military Academy in that state; a Great War combat
veteran, he was quiet, deliberate, meticulous, thoughtful, imaginative and
far-sighted, and became known postwar as a near-genius.
Douglas MacArthur -- General; Commander, Army Department of the Philippines;
Manila, P.I. The son of a general who had commanded in the Philippines after
the Spanish-American War, he'd been a Great War combat brigade commander and
postwar Army Chief of Staff; semi-retired, he was sent back to the
Philippines by Roosevelt in 1935 to create and organise a native Philippine
Commonweath defence force for its government. He had an immense ego and
fondness of flattery, a lofty aristocratic view of rank's rights and
privileges, was a consummate Army politician and publicity-seeker, and held
firmly to the twin notions that he was not only the nation's best general,
but that he alone truly knew and understood the Far East and all Orientals,
most particularly the Philippines and their people.
Walter Campbell Short -- Lieutenant-General; Commander, Army Department of
Hawaii; Honolulu, Hawaii. A veteran of the Mexican Punitive Expedition in
1916 and a combat leader in France during the Great War, he was solid,
detail-critical, utterly reliable, sternly duty-conscious, and steadily rose
postwar in both rank and reputation, achieving 3-star rank ahead of several
seniors.